Pelletized Tree Nut Animal Litter And Method Of Making Same

ABSTRACT

A method of making animal litter from a tree nuts, such as from a walnut composition of shells, pelica and membrane, by grinding or crushing the walnut composition, removing all or almost all of the shells from the walnut composition by vibration and aspiration to form muller, adding any desired additives to the muller (e.g. fragrances, fillers and extenders, clumping agent such as guar bean, mold inhibitor agent such as calcium propionate, etc.), and pelletizing the muller by heating and compressing the muller through small apertures and cutting the muller exiting the apertures at desired lengths. The heating and compression of the muller results in pellets that have odor absorbing characteristics that outperform commercial animal litters.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.13/029,890, filed Feb. 17, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/305,203, filed Feb. 17, 2010, which areboth incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to animal litter, and more particularly toan animal litter made of pelletized organic materials from tree nuts.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An ideal animal litter is one that is highly absorbent, controls odor,and does not break down to the point that the animal tracks the litteroutside of its container. Various solutions have been proposed andmarketed. Clumping agents have been included in litter material, so thatthe soiled portions of the litter clump together to control odor andfacilitate removal of just the soiled portions of the litter. However,clumping agents alone do not sufficiently control odor for mostapplications. Odor control is generally addressed by adding inorganic ororganic acids, chemicals, buffering agents, fragrances and/or othermixtures and compositions to the litter to mask the odor and/or producean odor masking smell when the litter is soiled. Some of these additivesare activated by the animal waste itself, while others are activated byagitation of the litter by the animal. Odor control can also beaddressed by sprays and other additives that are applied to the litterafter it is soiled.

The drawback to most of these litters is that the additives used areexpensive to make or obtain, generate hazardous waste byproducts duringmanufacture, and/or fail to break down properly when disposed inlandfills.

It is known that pelletized walnut shell byproducts can be used for woodburning applications. In large scale processing of walnuts, crackingplants typically remove the meat of the walnuts from their shells. Theshell byproduct left behind comprises the outer shell itself, the pelica(thin layer between the shell and the meat) and the membrane (thin layerbetween sections of the meat). Traditionally, the shell byproduct isburned or otherwise disposed of in landfills. However, the shellbyproduct has also been combined with saw dust, pelletized by mixingwith water and compressing the resulting slurry through a small holes ina die, and marketed as a wood burning product. There was no suggestionhowever that the pellet composition could be altered to provide odorcontrol as an animal litter.

There is a need for an absorbent organic litter that sufficientlycontrols odor without reliance on expensive inorganic chemicaladditives.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Animal litter that includes walnut membrane, walnut pelica, and a moldinhibitor agent. The animal litter contains no walnut shells. The animallitter is in the form of discrete pellets.

Animal litter that includes walnut membrane, walnut pelica, and a moldinhibitor agent. The animal litter contains no walnut shells. The animallitter is in the form of crushed or ground discrete pellets.

Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparentby a review of the specification, claims and appended figure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing of the pelica andmembrane portions of walnuts into pelletized animal litter of thepresent invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing of the pelica andmembrane portions of walnuts of FIG. 1 with an additional crushing orgrinding step performed on the pelletized animal litter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is an organic animal litter that provides superiorodor control properties. It has been discovered that the pelica and themembrane portions of walnuts and other tree nuts, when pelletized,provide a material that is highly absorbent and neutralizes odor, and isideal for use as animal waste litter. Moreover, the pelica and membraneportions of walnuts are a waste byproduct of the walnut industry, sothis is an ideal source materials for animal litter that would otherwiseneed to be burned or discarded as waste.

In large scale processing of walnuts, cracking plants typically removethe meat of the walnuts from their shells. The shell byproduct leftbehind comprises the outer shell itself, the pelica (thin layer betweenthe shell and the meat) and the membrane (thin layer between sections ofthe meat). Traditionally, the shell byproduct is burned or otherwisedisposed of in landfills. However, it has been discovered that properlyprocessing and pelletizing this byproduct after removing all or almostall of the shell component produces a material that absorbs animalwaste, does not break down during use, and surprisingly and naturallymasks odor better than most chemical based animal litters.

The preferred method of preparing and pelletizing the walnut pelica andmembrane byproduct is as follows:

Step 1: Receive walnut shell byproduct after the meat has been removed(e.g. from walnut cracking plants). Cracking plants that process walnutsfor the meat end up producing shell byproduct that is a combination ofthe walnut's outer shell, pelica and membrane.

Step 2: Inspect the shell byproduct and remove any foreign materials ifany from the shells, pelica and membrane. It is also preferable toinspect the shell byproduct to ensure the moisture content is around 10%or less (i.e. utilizing a moisture meter calibrated for walnut shells).It is preferable to avoid a higher moisture content because excessivemoisture will prevent proper pelletizing. If the moisture content isdetermined to be too high, then the material may have to be dried beforeproceeding by, for example, heating. If the source of the shellbyproduct reliably provides shell byproduct with little or no foreignmaterials and with a sufficiently low moisture content, then this stepcan be skipped.

Step 3: Grind or crush the shell byproduct so that its larger componentsare of a semi-uniform size (preferably half an inch or less). Onepreferable grinding apparatus is a hammer mill. The ground materialcomponents will be shell particles (relatively large and/or heavy) andpelica/membrane particles (relatively small and/or light). This step canbe skipped if the shell byproduct particles are already sufficientlysmall.

Step 4: Remove all or almost all of the shell particles from shellbyproduct. This removal involves extracting or separating the smallerand/or lighter membrane and pelica particles from the larger and/orheavier shell particles. One technique that can be used to perform thisseparation step involves a vibrating table and aspiration. The ground orcrushed material is passed over a vibrating table at a determined speed,which tends to free and separate the various particles from each other,and repeatedly suspend the particles in the air just above the table,where the smaller and/or lighter pelica/membrane particles are sweptaway via aspiration, leaving the larger and/or heavier shell particlesbehind. In practice, it can be impractical to remove all of the bits ofshell as some shell particles tend to be aspirated along with thepelica/membrane particles. Therefore, this step is preferably repeatedseveral times to extract the membrane and pelica particles with aslittle of the shell particles as reasonably practical (i.e. anyremaining shell particles constitute no more than about 30% of theresulting material by volume). The resulting material is referred to as“muller”.

Step 5: Insert one or more desired additives to the muller. This stepmay be optional, depending on the final application and configuration ofthe animal litter, and can be implemented while the muller is in dryform just after separation, or in wet form by adding water or as part ofthe pelletizing process described below. For example, fillers orextenders can be added to the muller, so long as the muller component ofthe slurry/paste is sufficiently high that the resulting pelletizedproduct adequately absorb the animal waste and neutralize the odorwithout falling apart or dissolving. It has been determined that amuller component of at least about 50% by volume (i.e. thefillers/extenders constitute no more than about half of the finalproduct by volume) adequately neutralizes the animal odor. It is themuller as the active ingredient, in pelletized form, that has been foundto be the key to neutralizing pet waste odor. Examples of fillers andextenders that can be mixed with the muller up to about 50% by volumeinclude pelica from other free nuts, rice hull (a byproduct ofprocessing rice), wheat, corn, tea leaves, paper and paper pulpproducts, wood fiber, saw dust, or any other materials that conglomerateand absorb.

Another additive that has been found to be important is a mold inhibitoragent. It has been discovered that mold can form on a soiled mulletbased litter, and the use of a mold inhibitor agent can be veryimportant. Examples of mold inhibitor agents include propionates (e.g.calcium propionate), sorbates, and sodium sulphite, and are sold undertrade names such as Tox Guard and Nabitor. Calcium propionate added inan amount of 1% by weight has been determined to work very well inpreventing the formation of mold.

Other possible additives include a fragrance (to provide an odor maskingsmell) and a clumping agent (to make the litter clump when wetted byanimal waste for easier removal and separation from unsoiled litter).Exemplary clumping agents include sodium bentonite clay (or othersimilar clay based substances or additives), guar bean (e.g. 3%-6% byweight), corn, or any other additive that promotes glomeration whenwetted.

Step 6: The muller is then pelletized by subjected it to a pelletizingprocess. The preferred pelletizing process includes subjecting themuller to steam and/or water to create a muller slurry or paste. Themuller slurry/paste is then fed into a die with specifically designedholes (e.g. conical in shape) of desired dimensions under pressure andheat (e.g. 40K PSI with a raised temperature of 250-300 degrees F.),whereby the muller slurry/paste is forced through the holes andextruding out as pellets on the other side. The heat can be externallyprovided by heating elements, or can result just from the compression ofthe muller. The pellets are cut-off at a length of up to about one halfinch, and then fed into a cooler which evaporates off excess moistureadded as part of the pelletizing process. The pellets can then bepackaged for shipment and sale.

The non-limiting physical properties of resulting pellets that have beensuccessfully reduced to practice are:

-   Diameter˜around three to four sixteenths of an inch-   Length˜around one half inch-   Bulk Density˜around 40 lbs/cubic foot-   Specific Gravity˜around 0.60-0.65-   Color˜dark brown-   Moisture˜around 7% or lower-   Appearance˜shiny coating on outside

Testing has shown that the mullet pellets neutralize the odor associatedwith animal waste better than over-the-counter commercial pet litter.The pellets are also highly absorbent, and are virtually dust free (i.e.there is no fine material, and the pellets keep their shape and do notbreak down under use where the animal would then track the materialaround).

It has been discovered that removing all or almost all of the shellcomponent from the muller (i.e. where any residual shell particles makeup no more than about 30% of the muller by volume), and pelletizing themuller material, are key steps in making it work as an ideal animallitter. Walnut byproduct still containing its shell component, orpowdered or granularized muller processed without pelletizing, is noteffective. Moreover, walnut byproduct containing more than about 30%shell by volume does not pelletize properly. It is only when the muller(with all or almost all of the shell component removed) is pelletizedthat it exhibits its superior animal litter properties. It is believedthat the combination of heat and pressure during the pelletizing processchanges the chemical composition of the muller, possibly forcing tanninsto the exterior of the pellet, that provides the odor control by theresulting pelletized product. In fact, it has also been discovered thatcrushing the pelletized muller to a consistency of granules, sand orpowder also results in a superior animal litter material as well. FIG. 2illustrates the added step of grinding or crushing the pelletizedmuller, to produce an effective litter of finer consistency (granules,sand, or powder). Animal litter of this consistency can be greatlyenhanced by the use of a clumping agent additive as discussed above.

While muller made from walnuts provides exceptional animal litterqualities, muller made from the pelica of other tree nut shells can alsobe used. For example, muller made from the pelica of almonds,pistachios, hazel nut and pecan can be used to make the muller alone,with each other, or even in combination with pelica and membrane ofwalnuts. The same process discussed above for walnuts can be used toprocess pelica from other tree nuts such as almonds, pistachios, hazelnut and/or pecan.

It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to theembodiment(s) described above and illustrated herein, but encompassesany and all variations falling within the scope of the appended claims.For example, references to the present invention herein are not intendedto limit the scope of any claim or claim term, but instead merely makereference to one or more features that may be covered by one or more ofthe claims. Materials, processes and numerical examples described aboveare exemplary only, and should not be deemed to limit the claims.Further, as is apparent from the claims and specification, not allmethod steps need be performed in the exact order illustrated orclaimed, but rather in any order that allows the proper fabrication ofpelletized muller.

What is claimed is:
 1. Animal litter, comprising: walnut membrane;walnut pelica; and a mold inhibitor agent; wherein the animal littercontains no walnut shells, and wherein the animal litter is in the formof discrete pellets.
 2. The animal litter of claim 1, wherein the walnutmembrane and the walnut pelica together form at least 50 percent of thevolume of the animal litter.
 3. The animal litter of claim 1, furthercomprising: an additive material which does not exceed 50 percent of thevolume of the animal litter.
 4. The animal litter of claim 3, whereinthe additive material is a fragrance.
 5. The animal litter of claim 3,wherein the additive material is a clumping agent.
 6. The animal litterof claim 5, wherein the clumping agent is guar bean.
 7. The animallitter of claim 3, wherein the additive material is rice hull.
 8. Animallitter, comprising: walnut membrane; walnut pelica; and a mold inhibitoragent; wherein the animal litter contains no walnut shells, and whereinthe animal litter is in the form of crushed or ground discrete pellets.9. The animal litter of claim 8, wherein the walnut membrane and thewalnut pelica together form at least 50 percent of the volume of theanimal litter.
 10. The animal litter of claim 8, further comprising: anadditive material which does not exceed 50 percent of the volume of theanimal litter.
 11. The animal litter of claim 10, wherein the additivematerial is a fragrance.
 12. The animal litter of claim 10, wherein theadditive material is a clumping agent.
 13. The animal litter of claim12, wherein the clumping agent is guar bean.
 14. The animal litter ofclaim 10, wherein the additive material is rice hull.